Reingold, Nathan [Historian of American science, at Smithsonian, editor of Joseph Henry Papers] -- NOTE: On Herapath, irreversibility; NR's paper on the supposed indifference of Americans towards basic (non-applied) scientific research; NR's rejected comment to Science on SGB's "Should the History of Science be Rated X?"; development of history of science as a discipline; NR letter to Gerald Holton on idea for meeting reviewing documentary editing; historians vs. scientists as historians of science., 1970-1991

Reingold, Nathan [Historian of American science, at Smithsonian, editor of Joseph Henry Papers] -- NOTE: On Herapath, irreversibility; NR's paper on the supposed indifference of Americans towards basic (non-applied) scientific research; NR's rejected comment to Science on SGB's "Should the History of Science be Rated X?"; development of history of science as a discipline; NR letter to Gerald Holton on idea for meeting reviewing documentary editing; historians vs. scientists as historians of science., 1970-1991, 2.7.12, Box: 7, Folder: 12.0. Stephen G. Brush papers, 0294-UA. Special Collections and University Archives. https://archives.lib.umd.edu//repositories/2/archival_objects/286668 Accessed June 10, 2024.